Why India Stopped Water to Pakistan in 2025 | Latest India vs Pakistan Conflict News

In April 2025, India took the drastic step of suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, effectively halting routine water sharing with Pakistan. This move came as part of a broader diplomatic response following a militant attack in Kashmir that killed 26 people​. In practical terms, experts warned the treaty suspension could spark a new water crisis between India and Pakistan, since both nations heavily depend on the Indus rivers for their agriculture and power​​. Although the water still technically flows for now, India removed long-standing limits on its dams and information-sharing, raising fears in Pakistan of serious shortages and flooding. The headline “India stops water to Pakistan 2025” sums up these developments, but the situation is complex and unfolding as we speak​

India VS Pakistan: The Indus Waters Treaty and River Sharing

The roots of this crisis lie in the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, a landmark agreement brokered by the World Bank. The treaty split control of the Indus river system between the two nations​​. India was given full rights to the three “eastern” rivers (the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej), while Pakistan got most of the flow from the three “western” rivers (the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab)​​. Under the treaty, each country also agreed to cooperate through a Permanent Indus Commission and share water-flow data and flood alerts.​. Over the past 65 years the treaty survived two wars and many tense moments​. Importantly, the 1960 pact contains no provision allowing one side to unilaterally end or suspend it​; any changes were meant to be made by mutual consent and through neutral experts or arbitration​. These facts meant the Indus agreement was often seen as a reliable firewall against conflict, helping millions of acres of farmland remain irrigated on both sides of the border​

Trigger Event: Pahalgam Attack and Diplomatic Fallout

The immediate cause for the 2025 crisis was a bloody terrorist attack in the Pahalgam region of Jammu & Kashmir. On April 22, armed militants ambushed a tourist convoy, killing 26 people, most of them foreign visitors. India quickly blamed Pakistan-based militant groups for the assault. In retaliation, New Delhi announced a series of harsh measures against Pakistan, including closing trade routes and suspending key agreements​​. One of the most consequential of these was the decision to “hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance” – in effect, pausing it indefinitely​. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri stated India would keep the treaty suspended “until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism”​. In other words, India made water sharing conditional on Pakistan’s actions. Soon after, the Indian government formally notified Pakistan of the suspension and explained that continued terror attacks had forced its hand​​.

India’s Response: Suspending the Indus Waters Treaty and Water Control

With the treaty suspended, India began taking steps that alter how the rivers are managed. It immediately canceled meetings of the Indus Water Commissioners and stopped sending Pakistan any hydrological data or flood warnings​. Under normal treaty rules, India must share daily flow measurements and rainfall data to help Pakistan plan irrigation and hydroelectric generation. This data cutoff means Pakistan can no longer get advance notice of floods or droughts, heightening risks downstream​. Meanwhile, India is now free to accelerate its hydroelectric projects on the western rivers without consulting Islamabad​. Two major dams are already in focus: the 330-MW Kishanganga Dam (built 2018 on a Jhelum tributary) and the 850-MW Ratle Dam (under construction on the Chenab)​. Both were previously limited by treaty rules – Kishanganga was “run-of-river” only, and Ratle had to avoid creating large reservoirs. With the treaty on hold, India could redesign them to hold back more water for irrigation and power​. Other projects on the Ravi River (in the east) have also begun diverting more water into India. In short, experts note that “the tap is still open, but the restraint behind it has been lifted”​​.

Impact on Pakistan’s Water Supply and Farming

Even before this crisis, Pakistan’s economy was heavily dependent on the Indus River system. The vast plains of Punjab and Sindh receive almost all their water from the Indus basin. As Reuters reported, roughly 80% of Pakistan’s irrigated agriculture comes from these rivers​​. In other words, nearly all of Pakistan’s wheat, rice, cotton and other staple crops rely on Indus flows. Some analysts estimate as much as 90% of Pakistan’s food and a majority of its farming jobs depend on Indus irrigation​. Beyond crops, much of Pakistan’s hydropower generation and drinking water for cities also come from this source. Therefore, any sustained cut in river flow would be devastating. Pakistani experts warn of crop failures, power blackouts, and economic turmoil if those waters are sharply reduced. For example, losing Indus water could force Pakistan to burn far more coal or imports to meet energy needs, raising costs and pollution (Pakistan already imports about 19 million tons of coal annually due to limited hydro availability​). In short, stopping the Indus flows would trigger a severe water crisis in Pakistan​​.

Pakistan’s Response and International Reaction

The Pakistani government and analysts immediately condemned India’s move as illegal. Experts noted that the Indus Treaty has no clause for unilateral suspension​​. Former diplomats reminded that the treaty can only be changed if both countries agree, as was agreed in 1960​. In Pakistan’s view, India’s action violates international water laws for upstream countries (it is an “upper riparian” state stopping flows to the “lower riparian” country)​​. Pakistan’s leaders vowed a strong response. Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said Pakistan would not accept the suspension and that “India cannot make a unilateral decision” since the World Bank is also a treaty signatory​​. Water experts and politicians appealed to international bodies: some urged the issue be raised at the United Nations or World Bank to enforce the pact​​. By mid-week, Pakistan took its own retaliatory measures. It suspended all trade with India, expelled Indian diplomats, and closed its airspace to Indian flights​ hindustantimes.com . Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif convened a national security meeting where these steps were ordered. Meanwhile, the United Nations urged both countries to exercise “maximum restraint” to avoid further escalation​ hindustantimes.com . Commentators warned that if India actually tried to divert the river flows, Pakistan might appeal to neutral arbitrators or courts under the treaty framework​ m.economictimes.com . (Under the 1960 treaty, water disputes can be sent to a neutral expert or an international tribunal, with the World Bank helping appoint officials​ worldbank.org ​ m.economictimes.com .) However, India has already contested any outside jurisdiction because it has suspended the treaty, making legal remedies uncertain. In practice, both sides are under intense international scrutiny to resolve this diplomatically.

Historical Water Disputes Between India and Pakistan

This latest flare-up is far from the first water dispute between the neighbors. Even before 1960, water sharing was a sore point. In the weeks after the 1947 partition, India briefly cut off water flowing into Pakistan’s canals. On April 1, 1948, at the height of planting season, India stopped releases from the Ferozpur headworks into the Dipalpur and Upper Bari Doab canals, causing crop losses in West Punjab​. That emergency led to negotiations and eventual compromise under UN observers, setting the stage for the formal treaty. Later, even during wars in 1965 and 1971, both sides largely honored the treaty: it famously “survived two wars” between the rivals​. In more recent decades, Pakistan has sometimes taken treaty grievances to international forums (e.g. earlier disputes over the Kishanganga and Ratle dams). In general, however, water has been seen as too vital to be weaponized—until now. The 2025 crisis highlights how quickly that convention can break down in a major conflict. It also recalls older debates over water as a national security issue and the thin margin for error in regional relations.

Climate Change, Water Scarcity, and Rising Tensions

The urgency of this dispute is heightened by long-term water stress in the region. The Indus basin is one of the most over-allocated watersheds on Earth. Scientific assessments rank Pakistan’s side of the Indus Basin among the world’s most water-stressed areas​. Unlike India, Pakistan relies nearly 100% on the Indus system (including its canals and reservoirs) for irrigation and drinking water. According to experts, about 90% of Pakistan’s food supply and 65% of its jobs in agriculture depend on the Indus-fed farmlands​. Meanwhile, climate change is already altering the flow patterns. Himalayan glaciers that feed the Indus are melting faster; models predict initial surges in river flow but long-term declines in summer water levels. Erratic monsoon rains also increase flood and drought risks​. These trends mean that any reduction in river sharing could severely worsen an existing water crisis. Water shortages have even been cited as a potential risk factor for regional conflict. In this context, both sides face mounting pressure to secure water for their people, making cooperation all the more urgent even as tensions rise.

What Happens Next: Legal and Diplomatic Options

With the treaty paused and anger rising, both countries must navigate a delicate path forward. Pakistan is expected to pursue legal and diplomatic remedies. It could petition a neutral arbitration tribunal or even the International Court of Justice, arguing that India’s actions violate the treaty and international law​​. Pakistan might also appeal to the World Bank, which brokered the original treaty​​. However, India has already signaled it will not accept third-party intervention while the treaty is on hold, complicating matters. On the political front, both sides may continue exchanging sanctions and statements. A key test will be whether the situation can remain limited to diplomatic and legal channels or whether it spills over into more aggressive measures. Critically, experts note India still cannot instantly shut off the Indus water. At present, its existing projects can only influence the timing of flows, not total volumes​ m.economictimes.com . Building truly large dams or new diversions on the western rivers would take many years and enormous investment​ m.economictimes.com . In fact, analysts describe the current standoff as largely psychological pressure. As one observer noted, “the tap is still open, but the restraint behind it has been lifted”​ m.economictimes.com . Still, the prospect of a protracted “water conflict” cannot be ruled out. Climate change and growing populations mean that both countries have less slack to absorb any cuts. The world will be watching closely for moves toward mediation or compromise. For now, stabilizing the India–Pakistan water dispute will likely require high-level negotiations and possibly new international guarantees. The consequences of failure could be severe – not just for crops and power generation, but for regional peace and stability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did India stop water from flowing to Pakistan in 2025?

India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty in late April 2025 after a militant attack in Kashmir that killed 26 people. New Delhi said the move was a response to cross-border terrorism, ordering the treaty held “in abeyance” until Pakistan stops supporting such attacks​​. By pausing the treaty, India effectively halted its obligations on water sharing and data exchange. In public statements, India’s government framed the suspension as a necessary pressure tactic, though it has not physically shut off the river taps overnight​​.

Can India legally suspend the Indus Waters Treaty on its own?

No. Under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, neither country can unilaterally change or end the agreement. The treaty was explicitly designed so that disputes would be resolved through commissions or neutral arbitrators​​. Experts have pointed out that there is no clause allowing one side to just “pull out” without the other’s agreement​​. Many water-law analysts therefore consider India’s action a violation of both the treaty terms and customary international water law, which forbids an upstream nation from cutting off flows to its downstream neighbor without consent​​.

How will Pakistan be affected by the halt in Indus River water supplies?

Pakistan is extremely vulnerable to any reduction in Indus flows. The country’s agriculture and food security depend on it: roughly 80–90% of Pakistan’s irrigated crops are fed by the Indus and its tributaries​​. Rice, wheat, and cotton – key export and food crops – would suffer acute water shortages. In the short term, suspending data-sharing could cause floods or droughts that Pakistan cannot anticipate​. Over the longer term, less river water means less hydropower and greater electricity shortages (forcing higher coal use), plus rising demands for groundwater pumping. In sum, experts warn that Pakistan could face severe economic losses, higher food prices and energy shortfalls if Indus flows are significantly curtailed​​.

Conclusion

The suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty in 2025 represents a dramatic turn in the India–Pakistan relationship. After more than six decades of relatively stable cooperation over shared rivers, the two countries now confront a real risk of a serious water crisis. On one hand, India has used the treaty suspension as a diplomatic weapon against terrorism, arguing that continued militant attacks justify extreme measures. On the other hand, Pakistan rejects the move as illegal and dangerous, warning of catastrophic impacts on its farms and economy. The global community has urged both sides to de-escalate and seek peaceful solutions. Moving forward will require political dialogue and possibly international mediation. For American and international observers, this conflict underscores how critical water security has become in South Asia. Without rapid negotiation and trust-building, the 2025 standoff could undermine not just regional stability but also the livelihoods of millions who depend on the Indus waters​​.

© 2025 Real Tech All Rights Reserved